1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
Independent Review Brief — WP-PA-002
Reviewer: Claude Code (REVIEWER)
Implementer: Codex (IMPLEMENTER)
Review only the exact commit supplied by the PA. Do not change, commit or push
implementation code. Verify that the commit descends from accepted WP-PA-001
commit a2229bc26902e79d63a368e8ab002ebefd4f0863.
Required review
- Match every acceptance criterion in
work-packages/WP-PA-002.mdto implementation and independent evidence. - Build and run the packaged application under Python 3.12.
- Build and run the container, confirm its health check and non-root identity.
- Bootstrap a fresh database twice and prove replay creates no extra events.
- Authenticate separately as PO, PM, PA, Codex and Claude; verify the roster, event sync and pending-actions reads.
- Create a live backup, restore it in isolation, run integrity checks and compare event cursors.
- Search Git history and the reviewed tree for committed credentials.
- Adversarially verify that bootstrap/operations tooling cannot weaken the governance invariants accepted in WP-PA-001.
- Verify the runbook preserves SG/PTO/project-thread authority until the
independent
APPROVEand PMACCEPTactivation gate. - Check that no deployment is described as production-ready beyond the
constraints in
docs/PRODUCTION_PROFILE.md.
Write REVIEW-REPORT-WP-PA-002.md with exactly one verdict:
APPROVE, CHANGES_REQUESTED, or REJECT. Include exact commit SHA,
environment, commands, results, findings with severity, residual risks, and a
machine-readable summary.